About Us

Executive Editor:
Publishing house "Academy of Natural History"

Editorial Board:
Asgarov S. (Azerbaijan), Alakbarov M. (Azerbaijan), Aliev Z. (Azerbaijan), Babayev N. (Uzbekistan), Chiladze G. (Georgia), Datskovsky I. (Israel), Garbuz I. (Moldova), Gleizer S. (Germany), Ershina A. (Kazakhstan), Kobzev D. (Switzerland), Kohl O. (Germany), Ktshanyan M. (Armenia), Lande D. (Ukraine), Ledvanov M. (Russia), Makats V. (Ukraine), Miletic L. (Serbia), Moskovkin V. (Ukraine), Murzagaliyeva A. (Kazakhstan), Novikov A. (Ukraine), Rahimov R. (Uzbekistan), Romanchuk A. (Ukraine), Shamshiev B. (Kyrgyzstan), Usheva M. (Bulgaria), Vasileva M. (Bulgar).

Additional Information


Login to Personal account

Home / Issues / № 6, 2018


Kurnosov V.
Summary: The article raises the problem of the struggle between bureaucracy and big capital.  The inevitability of the victory of financial capital over industrial.  Planning for financial capital.  The subordination of government procurement large capital.  The inevitability of inflation.

Key words: planning, financial capital, public procurement contract system, inflation

A reasonable person is able to predict events in the surrounding world on the basis of predicting the behavior of the existing systems of the material world.  We will not go into the world of esotericism and metaphysics.

Thus, the process of planning activities in the sphere of material production is inevitable.  With the introduction of state and municipal procurement on the basis of a contractual system [1], procurement transparency in the fight against corruption was announced.  It was also announced on improving the efficiency of procurement.  The very concept of "efficiency" hides a completely mysterious meaning for participants in a commercial transaction.  The program "Birch" is being developed for wider involvement of small businesses to participate in government procurement.  In fact, the opposite is true.

Why in the Russian Federation planning process is limited to the development of concepts of strategic planning?  And why instead of a balanced management of the national economy in the course of program-target planning with a predominance of indicative indicators?

The answer lies in the nature of established relations: the bureaucratic apparatus of the state, on the one hand, and capitalists of all stripes, on the other.  Karl Marx wrote that in the inevitable non-antagonistic struggle one or the other would win with varying success.

In his book, professor of MGIMO V.Yu.  Katasonov comes to unexpected conclusions about the victory of financial capital over industrial capital.

"The Hilferding forecast for all industrialized countries is the inevitability of the victory of cosmopolitan financial capital over" locally limited "industrial.  It is this victory, according to Hilferding, that the socialists and left radicals are called to contribute, provoking "when necessary" crises, strikes and social upheavals that ruin industrialists and sharply increase the demand for bank credit, strengthening financiers.  For example, in Russia in the period of the revolutionary chaos of 1905-1956, the profit of commercial banks more than doubled.  A similar situation developed in the West, during the Great Depression of 1929.  What does this lead to?  Hilferding writes: "The financial capital in its completion is the highest degree of completeness of economic and political power concentrated in the hands of the capitalist oligarchy." [2]

Talk about world government takes on real traits in the form of managing the world by a financial oligarchy from one center.  Citing the book by R. Hilferding "Financial Capital. M.-L: Politizdat, 1959.  P.432 "V.Katasonov considers the requirements of financial capital for the organization of relations in the world on the basis of quotas and restrictions, and in fact on a planned basis, which were inherent in the Soviet Union.  "Hilferding called for such capitalism, in which production will be controlled by a financial oligarchy from one center - like the Soviet Gosplan.  There will be no free market prices for industrial products: "price will cease to be an objectively determined value." "" [1]

Considering the relationship between the state and business within the framework of the contract management system of state and municipal procurement, one can note the significant impact of financial capital on the bidding process.  All trades are necessarily conducted on electronic platforms using bank escorts and bank guarantees.  Entrepreneurship was given a choice: either not to participate in tenders with limited current assets or to contact financiers for short loans without collateral.

If in the regions there is practically no production of items necessary for the functioning of state institutions, they are naturally purchased through second-hand dealers from large monopolistic capitalist associations.  The stated budget savings, as the goal of the contract system loses its relevance.

Hence the inevitable redistribution of budget funds between large monopolists, without the participation of the real manufacturing sector in the regions.  There will be a natural rise in prices not because of overproduction of the money supply, but because of the monopolization of power by financial oligarchs interested in increasing financial, rather than real capital.

Hence, the fight against enterprises, stated in the texts of the Law "On the Counterparty System ...", [1] registered in offshore zones is reminiscent of the fight against windmills.

The state, dominated by financial oligarchs, is forced to use planning mechanisms, but in the interests of large financial capital.

 And control, in its various forms, as a function of power.

1. Federal Act of 04/05/2013 N 44-FZ (as amended on 08/03/2018)

On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services for the provision of state and municipal needs (ed. From 03.08.2018)] Electronic resource]. - Mode of access to the source: http://www.consultant.ru, free (contact date 25.10.2018

2. Katasonov V.Yu. Capitalism. The history and ideology of the “monetary civilization” / Scientific Editor O.A. Platonov.-M .: Institute of Russian Civilization, 2013.-1072с.

Bibliographic reference

Kurnosov V. PLANNING IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY AS INEVITABLE. International Journal Of Applied And Fundamental Research. – 2018. – № 6 –
URL: www.science-sd.com/478-25482 (22.05.2024).